In the Promenade, and here and there in Récoltes et Semailles I will be .. travaux mathematiques de A. Grothendieck”)was written in in. Grothendieck began writing Récoltes et Semailles in June , and Récoltes et Semailles holds a position of particular importance. Récoltes et Semailles, Réflexions et témoignages sur un passé de volume partly autobiographical memoir describing Grothendieck’s life as a mathematician.
|Published (Last):||23 July 2016|
|PDF File Size:||7.91 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.66 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
But I’ve come across a very small portion of them only. I think this is right Now I’ve got two answers quite different in nature and in tone and since I’m equally pleased with both of them perhaps I should just let them benefit the community and don’t decide to officially accept one of them. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. If so, is there any written evidence of it, or any account of the development of the mathematical ideas that Grothendieck has expressed in this text?
Alexandre Grothendieck: Récoltes et semailles (1986)
Wow, someone should make this an open source project or something.
One suspects that the habits of the Grothendieck school, whereby the six operations had to be established first in every situation where a problem seemed worth solving, could be enormously helpful in some situations, and limiting in some others.
Sign up using Facebook.
Nathan marked it as to-read Nov 14, No trivia or quizzes yet. I didn’t come anywhere near to reading the whole thing, but I did spend rrcoltes hours dipping into various portions while I was a graduate student.
Minhyong Kim 9, 10 58 Thanks Thiery for correcting my misconception.
Récoltes et semailles in nLab
Hence, arithmetic homotopy theory. No doubt the emphasis would be in scheme-like categorical constructions and “devissage” style properties.
I am still not sure I interpret you question correctly, so I will refrain from editing it myself. I have no doubt that this is a really hard question to tackle. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
Jean-baptiste Soufron rated it it was amazing Jun 16, You may also want to remove or rephrase that section in your question. It would be interesting to know Grothendieck’s ideas in greater detail. Peyman Morteza rated it it was amazing Dec 11, In the latter case, I could come up with some possible explanations: Alexandre Puttick marked it as to-read Nov 17, And the hierarchy goes on A topic that perhaps has not been so intensely pursued is his point of view on the cohomology of singular spaces.
More precisely, motives were inadequate for the study of points the most basic maps between schemes!